Litigation Chair Marc Lazo Secures Defense Victory in Wilson Harvey Browndorf LLP’s Orange County, California Office

Irvine, Calif. (March 12, 2014) – The partners at Wilson Harvey Browndorf LLP, a New York and Southern California based full service law firm, announced today that on March 7, 2014, Managing Partner Marc Lazo secured a major defense victory following a two-week premises liability jury trial. This win stands particularly triumphant for the firm because despite a recent trend of Orange County juries awarding large verdicts to personally injured plaintiffs, Mr. Lazo was able to secure a favorable verdict for the defense.

The inciting incident of the case took place at a Holiday Inn in San Clemente, California. The plaintiff, a formal world record-holding swimmer and Ironman competitor, claimed that she suffered life-altering physical injuries from a fall on an allegedly defectively designed walkway in the hotel’s parking garage. The plaintiff claimed she was injured in such a way that her competitive career was forever taken away from her and will prevent her from future record-breaking pursuits. The plaintiff sought hundreds of thousands of dollars in retribution for damages and pain and suffering. Her lawyer, a highly experienced trial attorney and member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, retained a safety expert who deemed the walkway unsafe for a variety of reasons, and notwithstanding the fact that defense had no such expert of its own, Mr. Lazo was able to obliterate the expert’s opinions in cross-examination. Ultimately, after just half-day of deliberation, the jury came back with a defense verdict and awarded the plaintiff no damages.

“Through the tenacious work of our team, we are proud to report this recent defense victory,” said Mr. Lazo. “We know that whatever the latest jury trend might be, we at Wilson Harvey Browndorf LLP will not back down from seeking justice for our clients, and will continue to strive for precedential setting verdicts and judgments that better our legal community as a whole.”

Leading the firm’s litigation practice out of the Irvine, California office, Mr. Lazo focuses his practice on complex business and commercial litigation, as well as insurance and real estate law. He represents premises owners, non-profit organizations, institutional lenders and brokers, as well as real estate developers and private investors in a wide array of litigation matters, and regularly advises his clients to develop litigation-avoiding strategies in their business operations and capacities.

BP Law Group, LLP/Wilson Harvey Browndorf LLP– Garner Huge Victory against Bryan Cave and Bluefire Ethanol

Irvine, CA (July 11, 2013)

As a crowning achievement, BP Law Group, LLP and its newly formed affiliate firm Wilson Harvey Browndorf LLP have emerged triumphant for its clients in Spiers v. Bluefire Ethanol. The firm represented two minority shareholders in the complex securities litigation case against the publicly-traded ethanol corporation and its officers and directors. The BP Law litigation team successfully prosecuted their client’s breach of contract and declaratory relief claims. This dramatically increased their clients’ holdings in the company and preserved their “full ratchet” anti-dilution protection rights. Read more

Judgment Obtained By Marc Lazo

WHB is pleased to congratulate its litigation partner Marc Lazo and his trial team on obtaining a judgment in favor of our clients in excess of $1.4m in Orange County Superior Court, California. The case involved real estate fraud and misrepresentation, and the judgment includes recovery of contractual attorney’s fees and will be amended to add punitive damages. More details to come!

DO THE EVOLUTION: THE EFFECT OF KSR V. TELEFLEX ON BIOTECHNOLOGY

In KSR v. Teleflex, the Supreme Court issued one of the most significant decisions dealt to intellectual property law in decades. The ruling effectively restructures the approach used by courts to determine whether a claimed invention is ‘non-obvious,’ a historically ambiguous and ill-defined condition to obtaining a patent.